Writesonic vs Jasper Face-Off: Speed, Quality & Price Compared
Image Source: AI GeneratedAI writing tools like Writesonic and Jasper differ significantly in their pricing. Writesonic costs just $15 monthly plan, while Jasper requires $49 per month to start.
These popular AI writing assistants excel in different areas. Writesonic has over 80 templates and built-in SEO tools. Jasper, on the other hand, has 50+ templates with easy-to-use controls that work great for long-form content. Both platforms leverage OpenAI’s latest GPT models and bring their own unique approach to content creation.
Choosing between Jasper and Writesonic needs careful consideration. Our detailed comparison will help you understand their content quality, generation speed, pricing plans and integration capabilities. You’ll discover which tool matches your specific needs perfectly.
Quick Overview: Writesonic AI vs Jasper
“The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”
— Stephen Hawking, Theoretical physicist and cosmologist
These platforms use OpenAI’s GPT models among other advanced language models to create content [1].
Key Features at a Glance
Jasper has 50+ specialized templates to create content [2]. Users can control writing style and tone with precision. The platform shines when it comes to brand voice integration. Users can train the AI with their brand’s specific assets [3]. On top of that, it works with tools like Surfer SEO, Copyscape, and DALL-E [2].
Writesonic comes with 80+ templates [2]. It has built-in SEO tools and works well with WordPress. The platform also features Botsonic for website embedding and Audiosonic that converts text to audio [3].
The biggest difference shows up in how they generate content. Writesonic can create a 3000-word article in one go. Jasper needs separate tools like intro generator, conclusion generator, and paragraph generator to do the same thing [2].
Platform Interface Comparison
These platforms take different paths when it comes to interface design. Jasper keeps things simple with a clean dashboard and smart use of white space [1]. Work gets organized into projects and folders, which works great when you’re handling multiple brands [1].
Writesonic puts its template library front and center. You’ll see recommended options like “instant article writer” and “article rewriter” right away [1]. In spite of that, this focus on templates can be too much, especially if you just want to work on specific content types [1].
Each platform’s document editor brings something unique to the table. Jasper’s editor lets you be more flexible. You can control outputs and add context through prompts [2]. You can highlight parts you want to change and pick writing styles as you go. Writesonic sticks to a more structured approach. While it’s not as flexible, it helps users who want more guidance in creating content [2].
Content Generation Speed Test
Speed tests show clear differences in how Writesonic and Jasper create content.
Blog Post Creation Time
Writesonic’s article writer creates content through a well-laid-out workflow. The system considers keywords, tone of voice, and CTA placement [4]. The platform can write a 2000+ word SEO-optimized article in one go [4]. The rigid template selection process needs extra setup time [5].
Jasper takes a more flexible path. Users can control outputs and add context while writing [5]. The platform’s step-by-step blog writing process lets you make live adjustments. You’ll need practice to master this process [5].
Social Media Content Speed
Writesonic shines at creating social media content. The platform has special templates for Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube [4]. It connects with Buffer through Zapier to streamline your social media workflow [4].
Jasper matches these features with its own social templates. The platform supports 30+ languages [6]. This makes it a great choice for businesses that target international audiences.
Product Description Generation
Both platforms create product descriptions quickly, each with its own approach. Jasper’s product description tool works in three steps:
- Input product name
- List features and benefits
- Generate description [6]
Writesonic creates product descriptions with code-ready formatting that works directly with CMS [4]. The platform builds complete landing pages with hero headers, CTAs, and value-driven benefits quickly [4].
These platforms differ in how they handle customization. Jasper’s Brand Voice feature helps match specific content styles by studying existing website content or uploaded documents [6]. Writesonic focuses on bulk generation instead, making it better for large-scale product listings [4].
Quality Analysis: Real Examples
Quality metrics show clear patterns in how these AI writing tools perform. G2 users rate both platforms at 4.8 overall [7], but specific features reveal notable differences.
Blog Post Quality Comparison
Jasper stands out in long-form content creation with its co-creation approach [1]. The platform’s AI Text Summarization feature scores 9.3 compared to Writesonic’s 9.0 [7]. The platform guides users through a well-laid-out workflow instead of generating complete posts automatically. This gives users more control over their final output.
Writesonic approaches content differently by generating complete blog posts from simple inputs like topics and keywords [1]. This automated method delivers faster results, though the quality tends to be more formulaic than Jasper’s collaborative approach.
Marketing Copy Analysis
Both platforms show strong performance in content generation with a score of 9.1 [7]. Jasper demonstrates more consistency in creative writing tasks because of its brand voice feature that learns and replicates specific writing styles effectively.
A comparison table of key quality metrics shows:
| Feature | Jasper | Writesonic |
|---|---|---|
| Grammar Check | 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Text to Image | 6.8 | 8.0 |
| Video Capabilities | 5.5 | 7.7 |
| Ease of Use | 9.1 | 9.4 |
Grammar and Accuracy Test
Both platforms provide strong grammar checking capabilities. Jasper’s integration with Grammarly [8] offers industry-standard grammar verification. The platform also partners with Copyscape for plagiarism detection and offers discounted credits to verify content [1].
Writesonic maintains its own grammar checking system and scores slightly higher at 8.9 compared to Jasper’s 8.6 [7]. The platform guarantees 100% plagiarism-free content, but users should still verify independently [1].
Both tools need human oversight for factual accuracy. Users note that Jasper sometimes provides incorrect information that needs fixing [2]. This makes fact-checking crucial in the content creation process.
Pricing Deep Dive
The pricing structures highlight key differences between these AI writing platforms.
Writesonic Pricing Plans
Writesonic uses a flexible pricing model with four tiers. The Free plan gives you 25 one-time credits to test the platform [3]. The Individual plan costs $16 per month with annual billing and comes with 100 monthly credits [3]. Small teams can opt for the Standard plan at $79 monthly, which has 1000 credits and two user seats [3]. Larger organizations can get custom pricing and credits through the Enterprise plan [3].
Each plan comes with these features:
- AI Article Writer 6.0
- Brand voice customization options
- Integration capabilities
- SEO optimization tools
Jasper AI Cost Structure
Jasper keeps its pricing simple with three tiers. The Creator plan starts at $49 monthly or $39 with annual billing [9]. Teams can get started at $125 monthly, which includes three user seats [10]. Large enterprises have access to a Business plan with custom pricing [9].
The features get better with each tier. You get unlimited AI-generated words and 50+ templates with the Creator plan [10]. The Teams plan adds SEO mode, plagiarism checking, and workflow tools [11]. Business users benefit from SSO integration and dedicated account management [9].
Value for Money Analysis
Both platforms give you good value in different ways. Writesonic is more budget-friendly, starting at just $16 monthly [3]. The credit system lets you adjust your usage based on what you need, which means premium content at lower costs [1].
Jasper targets professional content creators and teams with higher pricing but advanced features. The $125 monthly Teams plan has detailed tools for content optimization and team collaboration [10].
The main difference lies in how these platforms handle scaling. Writesonic’s credit system gives you flexibility as your content needs change [3]. Jasper works better for teams that need consistent, high-volume content with its unlimited word generation model [9].
Integration Capabilities
AI writing platforms’ integration capabilities determine their value in daily work.
Third-party Tool Support
Writesonic connects with other tools through Zapier, which lets users automate tasks with over 5000 applications [1]. The platform works with Surfer SEO and Semrush to optimize content [4]. Users can also access Writesonic’s API to build custom applications [4].
Jasper takes a more focused path with its integrations. The platform works with specific tools:
- Grammarly to improve writing
- Copyscape to check for plagiarism
- Surfer SEO to optimize content
- Chrome extension for easy access [1]
The biggest difference lies in Zapier access – Writesonic includes this feature in all plans, which gives users more options. Jasper limits Zapier to Business plan users only [5].
WordPress Integration
Each platform handles CMS integration differently. Writesonic shines with its one-click WordPress publishing [4]. The platform supports popular blogging sites including:
- WordPress (.com and .org)
- Wix
- Medium [4]
Direct publishing makes the content workflow smooth and eliminates manual work [12]. Writesonic’s WordPress integration works both ways, so content stays in sync between platforms [2].
Writesonic leads in connectivity options [12]. The platform welcomes custom integrations to meet specific business needs [2]. Changes appear instantly across connected tools thanks to immediate synchronization [2].
A detailed comparison shows these differences:
| Integration Feature | Writesonic | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier Access | All Plans | Business Plan Only |
| WordPress Publishing | Direct Integration | Limited |
| SEO Tool Integration | Surfer, Semrush | Surfer |
| Custom API Access | Available | Not Specified |
| Real-time Sync | Supported | Platform-dependent |
Comparison Table
| Feature | Writesonic | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $15/month | $49/month |
| Templates | 80+ | 50+ |
| Content Generation | Generates 3000-word articles in one go | Needs separate tools for intro, conclusion, and paragraphs |
| SEO Tools | Built-in | Integration with Surfer SEO |
| Grammar Score | 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Text to Image Score | 8.0 | 6.8 |
| Ease of Use Score | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| WordPress Integration | One-click publishing with direct integration | Limited |
| Zapier Access | Available on all plans | Business plan only |
| Language Support | Not mentioned | 30+ languages |
| Brand Voice Feature | Simple customization | Advanced with training capability |
| Additional Features | – Botsonic for website embedding – Audiosonic for audio conversion |
– Integration with Grammarly – Copyscape integration |
| G2 Overall Rating | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Conclusion
Writesonic and Jasper have emerged as leading AI writing tools, each with its unique strengths. Writesonic attracts users with affordable pricing at $15 monthly. Its comprehensive template library and built-in SEO tools make it a perfect fit for small businesses and content creators who need quick content.
The $49 monthly price tag might seem steep, but Jasper delivers exceptional value through its brand voice integration and refined content controls. Professional writing teams and enterprises love how it helps them create consistent, quality content. The platform’s shared workflow features streamline team collaboration effectively.
Recent performance tests show interesting differences between these tools. Writesonic quickly produces complete articles, while Jasper takes a more methodical approach. Both tools maintain impressive G2 ratings of 4.8, though Writesonic scores slightly better in user-friendliness (9.4 vs 9.1) and image generation (8.0 vs 6.8).
Your specific needs should guide your choice between these platforms. Writesonic works best if you want affordable, quick content generation. Jasper proves more valuable when you need advanced brand voice training and detailed content control.
References
[1] – https://imeanmarketing.com/blog/writesonic-vs-jasper/
[2] – https://carminemastropierro.com/jasper-ai-vs-writesonic/
[3] – https://writesonic.com/pricing
[4] – https://writesonic.com/compare/writesonic-vs-jasper
[5] – https://zapier.com/blog/writesonic-vs-jasper/
[6] – https://www.jasper.ai/tools/product-description-generator
[7] – https://www.g2.com/compare/jasper-ai-vs-writesonic
[8] – https://writesonic.com/blog/copyai-vs-jasper
[9] – https://www.jasper.ai/pricing
[10] – https://blogginglift.com/jasper-ai-pricing/
[11] – https://www.g2.com/products/jasper-ai/pricing
[12] – https://www.alexbirkett.com/jasper-vs-writesonic/
